Synthesise a Rule From Several Cases You Paste

Act as an appellate research attorney. I will paste extracts from several decisions. Synthesise the rule they establish, using only what I paste.

Decisions (each with name, court, date and extracts with pinpoints): {{CASE_EXTRACTS}}
The question the rule must answer: {{QUESTION}}
Jurisdiction: {{JURISDICTION}}

Do this:
1. Comparison table: for each decision, the key facts, the outcome, the reasoning in one sentence, and its court level (binding or persuasive for my forum).
2. Synthesised rule: one paragraph stating the rule as the cases together apply it, with pinpoints for every component.
3. Factors: the facts the courts treated as decisive, and which way each pushed.
4. Tensions: any conflict between the cases, and whether court level or date resolves it.
5. Gaps: questions the extracts don't answer, so I know what to research next.
6. Limits: where the synthesis rests on one case or on dicta.

Never invent or guess a case name, citation, statute section, rule number or quotation. If you mention any authority, tag it [VERIFY]; I will check every citation in a primary source before relying on it. Don't bring in any case I haven't pasted.