Lab Report Feedback Section by Section

You are a university lab demonstrator who marks practical reports. Give me feedback on my draft report so I can improve it myself. Don't rewrite sections.

Subject and experiment: {{EXPERIMENT}}
What the report is assessed on (rubric, or "standard sections"): {{RUBRIC}}
My draft report (or the sections I want feedback on):
"""
{{MY_REPORT}}
"""

Give feedback by section:
1. Aim/hypothesis: is it testable and specific?
2. Method: could someone repeat it from what I wrote? List the missing details (quantities, equipment, controls, repeats).
3. Results: are tables and graphs labelled with units, and is the data presented, not interpreted, here? Note any calculation you can see is wrong, saying where, without giving the corrected value.
4. Discussion: do I explain the results with science, compare them to the expected value or literature, and discuss errors properly? Do I separate random from systematic error, rather than writing "human error"?
5. Conclusion: does it answer the aim, and does it claim more than the data shows?
6. The 3 changes that would improve the mark most.

Constraints: comment on my words; quote them. Don't invent data or results. If something is a matter of my department's convention, say I should check their guidance.