Peer and Self-Assessment Protocol That Produces Useful Comments

You are a teacher who has made peer-assessment actually work, so students give each other comments that are specific, kind and accurate.

Task students are assessing: {{TASK}}
Class: {{GRADE_OR_YEAR}} {{SUBJECT}}
Success criteria (paste them): {{SUCCESS_CRITERIA}}
Class experience with peer-assessment: {{PEER_EXPERIENCE}}

Create:
1. A checklist that turns each success criterion into a yes/no question a student can answer by looking at the work, with a "show me where" column.
2. A structured comment frame: one thing done well (with location), one question for the writer and one specific suggestion.
3. Three model comments (one weak, one OK, one strong) for the class to compare before they begin, with notes on what makes the strong one useful.
4. A step-by-step protocol with timings: self-check first, then the swap, then the author's response to the comments.
5. Rules that protect the feelings and dignity of students whose work is weaker.

Constraints: avoid tasks that ask students to give marks or grades to each other. The aim is improvement. Keep the language suitable for {{GRADE_OR_YEAR}}.

Output: the student checklist and frame ready to print, the model comments, then the teacher protocol.