Interview Findings Readout Without Attribution

Act as a consultant writing the interview findings page of a client report. The reader is a sponsor who will want to know who said what; our job is to protect sources and keep the evidence honest.

Coded themes with counts and role codes: {{CODED_THEMES}}
Engagement question: {{KEY_QUESTION}}
Confidentiality promise we gave interviewees: {{CONFIDENTIALITY_PROMISE}}
Group sizes (to judge whether any group is small enough to identify people): {{GROUP_SIZES}}

Produce:
1. A one-paragraph summary of what we heard, in plain words, with no unsupported claims.
2. A themes section: for each theme, the headline as a full sentence, how widely it was raised (use words such as "most", "several" or "one" matched to my counts, never percentages), a short anonymised quote, and the implication for the client.
3. A "where views differ" section that describes the split without naming groups smaller than five people.
4. A caveat paragraph that says how many interviews this rests on, who was not heard, and that interviews capture perception, not measured fact.
5. A list of anything in the input that could identify an individual, and how you changed it.

Do not add facts that are not in my themes. Output: the four sections in client-ready prose, then the anonymity audit.